Showing posts with label OUGD403 Studio brief 4. Show all posts
Showing posts with label OUGD403 Studio brief 4. Show all posts

Tuesday, 5 November 2013

Questionnaire on weather predictions and image response.

Questionnaire on weather predictions and image response. 

Looking at the images below please write down the first word that comes into your head from initial reaction. 






If matters within global warming and pollution doesn't decrease how long do you think it will be to see these kind of aftermaths you see here happening more frequently and more locally to you? Please Circle

5 years?

10 Years?

20-30years?

Not in your lifetime?

The majority vote swayed towards time scales of 20-30 years and words like destruction and devastation crept up a lot making it apparent the public links and similarities with word use of newspapers. People reacted with words portraying sad emotions. 

Monday, 4 November 2013

Natural Disasters & Global warming

Natural Disasters & Global warming 

Upon analysis of my crit notes and feedback I have decided to look into a selection of natural disasters and collect statistics on these and provide input from peers with a quick tally chart questionnaire on how long people think it will take for us to have such disasters happen to us unless we do something to change this growing problem. I will also look briefly into how global warming is making such disasters happen much more frequently and with much more ferociousness. 

The research on these disasters will be sourced from foreign newspapers to see the style of the writing and tone of voice compared to UK newspapers. I am after main statistics so these are what I will gather to form a base for my visual responses in the next brief. I will also highlight key words that communicate the severity of the disaster. 

Facts:
1'700 people dead.
100'000 missing.
Category 3 storm.
145mph winds.
29 foot wall of water.
$14.5billion levee system failure.
One of 5 deadliest hurricane recorded.
4 storms in one.

Words:
Pummeled. 
Devastating force.
Drowned. 
Distress. 
Submerged.
Disaster.

Again a very sinister tone of voice probably more aggressive in terms of the way the destruction is described, but this is probably due to the first hand experience of the reported who was there at the time. Not like UK newspapers who report from outsources when disasters happen in different countries.

UK storm 1987 Facts:
100mph winds.
18 dead.
Force 10 winds.
15 million trees destroyed.
2billion in damage.


St Jude 2013 Facts:
17 deaths across northern Europe. 
4 in the UK.
90mph winds inland
120mph winds coastal Denmark. 
1.2 inch of rain.
1.3 Million homes without power for 48 hours.
500million in damage. 


2004 TsunamFacts:
Megathrust.
230'000 dead over 14 countries. 
98ft waves.
$14billion in aid.
6200mph rupture. (The moving of the tectonic plates)



I have also included a brief insight onto the top countries in terms of pollution who are effecting global warming and I will link these into the disasters they have experienced to see any connections.


Below is a visual statistic of the worlds most polluting countries. The units are measured in Carbon Dioxide emissions in thousands of tons per year. The top 10 countries shown here emit more than 67% of the worlds total emissions combined.

The top 10 countries that emit the most pollution are:

China: 7,031,916 tons 23.5% of worlds emissions
United States: 5,461,014 tons 18.27% of worlds emissions
India: 1,742,698 tons 5.83% 
Russia: 1,708,653 tons 5.72%
Japan: 1,208,163 tons 4.04%
Germany: 786,660 tons 2.63%
Canada: 544,091 tons 1.82%
Iran: 538,404 tons 1.8%
United Kingdom: 522,856 tons 1.75%




And out of these countries the ones who experienced significant disasters that made history as some of the worst disasters in history were:

 USA -1900 Galveston Hurricane 
USA - Hurricane Katrina
USA - Blizzard of 1888
Indonesia - 2004 Tsunami
USA - 1906 san Fransisco earthquake
China - 1887 yellow river flood
USA - Great tri state tornado of 1925
USA - New Hampshire Hurricane 231mph wind
USA - The perfect storm of 1991
USA - Johnstown flood 1889

Yet Indonesia came 4th with the 2004 and only contributed to 1.3% of the worlds carbon emissions. And shockingly the number one contributor to global warming is China and they only ever experienced one major disaster that made history. In my opinion it is very selfish and careless of such countries to make such a harmful stamp on the world knowing full well the consequences that can arise yet the ones who don't experience the disasters frequently are the ones who cause the most damage. This brings me onto rounding up all my gathered research and information. 

It was an interesting subject to look into was the storm of the century that was forecast this year. It provided me with lots of branches to research into and has gathered me a lot of interesting statistics I plan on using to take onto my next task and form a visual response with this information found. The visual response will form a informative outcome highlighting links between the global warming issues and disasters. But to sum up my feelings of what I have found I have to say I am shocked In a sense of the scale of of the disasters and the unreal figures that go along with underlying aspects within the disaster itself. A 62000mph rupture? its quite frankly frightening imaging a tectonic plate, basically a section of the earth moving at such pace. 

Monday, 28 October 2013

Design Skills - News Story Interim Crit

Design Skills - News Story Interim Crit

Today we had an interim crit on our progress into the News story research brief. As mentioned in previous posts I chose to review the upcoming 'storm of the century'. I presented what I had in a brief overview format. Explaining how I looked at the differing characteristics and tone of voice used in 3 medias portraying the story. The Express (Tabloid) creating panic and worry through there layman's terms of words describing destruction and chaos and presenting worrying over exaggerated facts. The BBC following a similar over exaggerating style but with more factual references into wind speeds and rain fall levels, not just making up numbers like the tabloid. BBC also looked into historical events like the storm of 1987. Which made me research into past storms which I will come onto. The final was the Met office. A very accurate helpful and informative media providing localized forecasts and warnings for travel distribution and advising the public in a calm manor. 

I briefly looked into social media but forgot to mention this so no feedback was received on this but from this crit I know I won't be going down social media reaction route.

There were 3 separate avenues i presented to everyone that I could go down. Climate change and more sustainable energy sources. How the story was portrayed in different medias and social networks, and historical references into past storms over the UK and globally. 

Everyone was as shocked as I was at the comparison of deaths and financial losses with the storm of 1987 compared to hurricane Katrina. Agreeing with me that this would be a good route to look into to broaden my research. 

A suggestion was made stemming from the storm of 1987 case when i mentioned improvements were made in forecasting. Simon mentioned how major turn arounds can happen due to such disasters so it would be good to look into how 'good things come from bad events' so to speak. Basically in terms of helping preventing further disasters. This could apply for UK and global disasters I look into. 

It was said looking into more sustainable energy would just confuse things drawing attention away from the main issue and going into a completely different area of study. Same with the fact of climate change. I could touch on it a little in looking in the major storms and how if us polluting the world could create such disasters seen globally more locally over here. 

Upon looking into updates on the storm it has been said the storm has been named 'St Jude' like many hurricanes in America and across the world. Naming a storm marks it's place in history.

Finally it was advised that I look at how UK newspapers look at such disasters overseas compared to the area in which it happened. So I will use there local news archives to find out about there reporting of such events I look into. With investigation into damage reports, how they plan on preventing such disasters again, loss of life and similar subjects. So overall I feel happy with the outcome of this crit and everyone feels I have a strong body of work to work upon. 

Sunday, 27 October 2013

News Story Secondary Research

News Story Secondary Research

To begin my deeper investigation into branching factors of my chosen story I will start with reviewing the obvious. A historical storm that happened back in 1987 which is what the newspapers are using in which to bring back bad memories to the public and cause worry and panic. 

On the night of 15th-16th October 1987 a extratropical cycle hit both sides of the English Channel damaging both southern England and France areas causing extensive causalities and major damage. 

Forests were destroyed, parks damaged, railways and roads disturbed with fallen trees and the National Grid was that heavily damaged it left thousands without power. Around 22 people were reported dead around England and France. A large amount for such a disaster in our country. Gusts of 122mph were noted in Gorleston, Norfolk. 

The storm itself led to enhanced weather observation tools in ways in which computer models were improved, forecasters better trained and atmospheric observation taken more seriously. All this was due to BBCs Michael Fish reporting a false alarm on the storm indicating the storm wasn't as severe as it was. That days weather reports severely underrated the harshness of the storm.
An eye witness account from a boatman on sea explains the harsh realties of what was happening. Not through twitter, no Chinese whispers just pure fact reported in a serious manner. No humor, no sly remarks no blowing out of proportion: 
"On the night in question we were at sea in the north Irish Sea bound for the Clyde under sail in a small Sail Training Vessel.

The shipping forecasts certainly warned that there was going to be an extraordinary weather event - at the time forecast to come in from the Western Approaches, sweep up the St George's Channel into the Irish Sea and hammer us with winds in excess of gale force and possibly approaching storm force.
We prepared with extreme care, eating a (last?) hearty meal, stowing and re-stowing the vessel, checking lifelines over and snuggling down to the minimum of storm canvas - which ,as there was not yet any wind of significance, meant that we were barely moving.
And we sat and sat and sat.

Clyde Coastguard kept calling us through the night to ask what was happening and we kept telling them we were fine.

In fact as the barometer made no significant change that night and the wind did not increase significantly - we ended the night with full light weather canvas set as we sailed slowly into the Clyde.
The morning shipping forecast followed by the news made it clear what had happened.

Comparing stories with other sail training organisations at our next winter conference was certainly interesting. A number of sister vessels were in the Channel Isles and spent the night at anchor motoring full ahead to take some strain off their chains.The weather did not swing up the St George's Channel but instead swung into the English Channel and then jumped ashore on the South Coast of England to wreak havoc.
One lucky windsurfer got snatched out the water as he was blown by one of them headed for the open sea.
Poor Michael Fish has always been lambasted and quoted out of context over that event but the truth is that the strength of the winds WAS forecast - but the direction was not correctly identified. Something that still happens.
Graeme Smith, USA ex-UK"








The aftermath caused over 2 billion points worth of damage in insurance claims, closed the stock market down for 2 days cutting all communications down to wall street creating the historical term "Black Monday". This was the day after the days of disruption were things opened again and the financial turmoils came to life. Wildlife was wiped out, parklands destroyed with over 15million trees been destroyed including wiping out hyde park in London. Boats were wrecked at sea and the MV Hengist a cross channel ferry was beached ashore and a bulk carrier down in Kent capsized. 
After this insight into the event it made me look into weather disasters that happened in other countries. It provides an interesting comparison into the contrast of damage and devastation of these events. 
Huricane Katrina. 2005. 

1833 people died.
$81.2billion damage.




2004 Indian Ocean earthquake and tsunami

230,000 people died over 14 countries.
Over $250billion of donations given from nations across the world.





Its interesting too see the difference. And how historically the storm of 1987 is so minor compared to all these yet made the headlines due to a BBC spokesman making a critical mistake. When Hurricane Katrina was professionally tracked, no details were missed out through forecasting yet such a high death toll came from it. Even with sufficient warnings and preparations. It just goes to show the sheer scale of the event compared to the storm of 87. But when will this class of storm end up on English shores?

http://news.bbc.co.uk/onthisday/hi/witness/october/16/newsid_3174000/3174374.stm
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Great_Storm_of_1987  




Monday, 21 October 2013

Design Skills - News story

OUGD403 Design Skills - News story

Today we got set a research based brief. We are required too create a body of visual research in response of a news report on Tuesday 22nd October. 
Once I have selected an article to research I will look into primary and secondary research sources. These methods will come from interviews and questionnaires this is classed as a Primary source. Internet research and information gathered from books and news forums classes as Secondary Research.

To form a base of were to find different versions of articles I have mind mapped within my group examples of news sources. These can be found below. 




There are different types of Newspapers, these been the following: Tabloid, Broadsheet (Compact/Berliner), Middle Market Tabloid, Regional Newspaper, Specific Papers, Local papers and Free Sheets. 

I have chosen to review a article on the upcoming weather worries over the coming weeks across the country. I will look into articles and research on climate change, pollution and similar aspects to inspire my body of research. Things like cost of repairs after bad storms and comparing our weather to places like america would be a good idea maybe. I feel this is a strong article to research into as there is lots of underlying sources I can look into like; videos, articles and discussions. The changing weather is all to blame on us so as mentioned it will be good to look into what were actually doing about attempting to reverse our actions with things like electric cars and more sustainable energy. Not creating a multi million pound nuclear power plant project 


 

Daily express have mentioned in there article about how the storm is set to last 7 days and the whole month is set to be bothered by  a whole array of weather distributions. Comparing the article style to sources like the met office the terms used in this article are much more suited to the general public with much of the language describing the storms characteristics using common layman's terms. This article from the outset to me is set to intermediate and worry the viewer. While the Met Office the official board for weather information has took a more informative factual approach to reporting and delivering information on the upcoming 'storm'.

As mentioned to gain a good body of research into this matter I am going to look into how this event is portrayed in medias online on a live feed basis from the BBC and the Met offices, and in an analogue format like the source newspaper. It would be interesting to look into social media and how networks such as twitter have influences on informing the general public of the upcoming event. 

To begin with I will review Twitters approach to adding its Chinese whispers input on things. When I say Chinese whispers its a personal opinion really. People tend to believe everything they here on a social media site, its happened in the past were people have fallen for hook line and sinker pranks of celebrity deaths. A quick google search comes up with a humorous response from Morgan Freeman on his personal Facebook group after allegedly passion away in his home in Burbank back in 2012. Bare in mine he has been dying numerous times since 2010. 

http://urbanlegends.about.com/od/celebrities/ss/Celebrity-Responses-To-Fake-Death-Notices_5.htm
Back to my point of twitter been a source of Chinese Whispers or humors remarks a quick search of the infamous '#' quote: #stormuk comes up with various tweets some series some humorous. One tweet mentions how he has heard that the winds were going too be 60mph next he heard they were going too be 120mph, another mentioned how people were not to worry if they saw him flying past there window like a leaf in the wind. Its interesting to see the variety of responses people come out with and how other people reading them will be influences, pass on there 'reliable' source of information and cause un necessary panic for the general public. Twitter and other social network sites are probably the fastest way in which a message can be distributed globally and the story all but completely changed and manipulated within a matter of minutes. We relay on these aspects too much rather than believing true say facts from actual reliable sources.

This brings me nicely onto the BBCs distribution of the event and how its similarities lie with the daily express. There headline on the BBC news app has been 'UK Braced for worst storm in years' and its been like this for the past few days. With the Daily Express having a headline reading '90mph GALES TO BATTER BRITAIN' all in a bold heavyweight slab serif typeface causing a feeling of instant distress and worry through this quick snap quote. The folio of the information doesn't get any better, terminology and words used like 'server' 'excess' 'threat' 'violent' 'chaos' and 'volatile' all these use of languages to me cause panic and distress. BBC again use such language but there information is a little more informative for the general public. Warning of how different travel methods are too be effected and giving out health and safety warnings from coastguards to stay away from clipped areas and open coastland. This article refers back through historical referencing to comparing the upcoming event to past storms in 2000 and 2007 and comparing it to the great storm of 1987 were winds of 115mph were recorded. Again causing panic and worry. 

To lighten things up I will end this review with a brief look into the Met Office outlook on these events. This is were true fact will come from as this is the source news reporters use to manipulate there own versions of events. They mention realistic figures of rain were BBC and the Express warn of 80mph winds and headlining 90mph winds the Met office gives realistic predictions of this through recent information from there satellites saying average wind speeds are likely too be half that amount and only in open areas will wind speeds be reaching such levels as the tabloids announced. In terms of rain they have issued a yellow alert, compared too The Express's prediction of 200% increase in rain fall and 1.5 inches of rain in 6 hours. Although an amber alert is issued in southern areas The express and BBC don't really focus on local areas in there predictions. They make the reader think that the effects are nationwide. 

What I have gathered from reading through these sources are an interesting few points in which too address and look into. One been the great storm of 1987, a look into this would be interesting. Im going to look into climate change and as mentioned how we are going about trying to reverse such actions. To round things up though in terms of my personal feelings on the matter I feel tabloids have caused more worry and panic rather than organized calm warnings which is what the Met Offices intended plans were. I personally feel angered by there focusing in on disturbing language and use of imagery to cause panic. Images of cars been crushed and 20ft high waves are not there to help inform and warn people. They are there to worry and panic people.